Film ReviewThe 'Esoteric' Flick
|
Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real? What if you were unable to wake from the dream, Neo? How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real world?
That said, when it is good, The Matrix is very goodgood enough to become a cult classic. The Messiah story set against a post-Armageddon world; the ancient Essene prophecy of the battle of "the sons of light" against "the sons of darkness" has already been fulfilled here, though not as man-against-man but man-against-machine. In this archetypal war man believes his only hope is to "scorch the sky," that is, cause a catastrophic perturbation that will diminish the world's solar energy, source of the machines' power. The machinesfifth-generation artificial intelligence marvels, having enough backup energy to complete their domination of menfind themselves masters of a world hidden in darkness and turbulent cloud cover. Energy-dependent, they turn to "farming" humans. An eerie scene shows acres upon acres of babies asleep in their dreams in incubator-pods, the ripe ones being machine-harvested for their heat and energy; this, of course, is a binary update of Gurdjieff's story of the magician and the sheep.(1) Humans offer no resistance because the AI machines have developed the Matrix, an artificial intelligence virtual reality illusion, a kind of cyber opium den, that allows each human his or her own personal and collective dream. Only a human being known as "the One" can save them.
Enter the messiah-to-be as computer hacker Neo Anderson (Keanu Reeves). Neo, certain that something unimaginable and sinister controls his life, seeks to learn the truth about the Matrix, something about which he has only heard whispered rumors. The intensity and sincerity of his search brings him to meet Morpheus (Lawrence Fishburne), a black skinhead inyes, of coursea long black trench coat, who knows about the Matrix. He tells Neo that the Matrix is omnipresent, that he is asleep, a slave to the Matrix, "a neural interactive simulation." To Neo, these are just words. He has no referent, no material with which to comprehend what Morpheus has told him. Morpheus offers him the chance to wake up, to see the truth, offering Neo a choice of taking one of two pillsred for the truth, blue for forgetfulness and dreams. Neo takes the red pill. An explosion of special effects follows. Neo, awakening from his AI dream of himself sees the reality of his situationhe is imprisoned in a pod among vast dark towers of billions of like pods all awaiting harvest. Awakening to the stark truth, he is immediately grabbed by a spider-like machine and flushed down the pod's drain into a sewer. Revived on Morpheus' hovercraft, Nebuchadnezzar, he hears Morpheus say: "Welcome to the desert of reality, Neo." "Why do my eyes hurt?" asks Neo. "You've never used them before," answers Morpheus. Neo now meets the unusual crew of the Nebuchadnezzar, a motley band of rebels, who only share one thing in commonthey have all chosen the red pill. Among them is Trinity (Carrie-Anne Moss), a black-leather-clad woman he has met earlier and Cypher (Joe Pantoliano). Though Morpheus, an updated John the Baptist, has found the One, or Jesus, in the wilderness of ordinary life, Neo, the former dreamer, has no notion that he is the One. By flick's end he earns and accepts his destiny, his true identity. In the meantime, he and his crewmates battle the sinister morphing agents of the Matrix, AI machines in human guise, suited and in dark glasses. The AI agents are programmed to hate the smell of human beings and their sole mission is to keep the human harvest from waking up from their dream of life.
Backdropped by eerie and inhuman lighting effects and lightning-quick virtual scene changes, The Matrix also packs a dazzling array of kung fu fights and tricks echoing such action films as Terminator, Alien, Dark City, The X-Files, and Men in Black along with Kubrick's seminal 2001: A Space Odyssey. The melange of comic book realism, hokey names, and Alice in Wonderland references, however, give a sophomoric coloring to what begins as an inventive exploration of the most serious question a human being can askwhat is the true purpose of human life? On a deeper level, the writer-director brothers Andy and Larry Wachowski mix a heady stew of B and mostly A influences that seriously distort the esoteric. The most egregious example is that one has only to take a pill to awaken. The hundreds of thousands who have taken LSD give ample evidence to the contrary. What is awakened is imagination in higher emotional center"Super samsara," as the late Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche put it. Oddly, in awakening, Morpheus (who is the Greek God of sleep) welcomes Neo to "the desert of reality" where apparently sensory experience is as dull as the food is tasteless. Given that, the question is, as one character asks"Why didn't we take the blue pill?" As one proceeds through the work of awakening, impressions become sharper, double in force. "What would it be like to be conscious in essence?" Gurdjieff is asked. "Everything more vivid," was his emphatic answer.(2) Said the Wachowski brothers in a recent interview: "Throughout history there have been people who have sought deeper meaning from life and have come to astonishing revelations. In this story we wanted to show what happens to a small group of people who ask questions that have very shocking answers. We wanted their discoveries to be the beginning of the story, not the end. What interested us is what those people would do once their awareness was expanded by what they had learned." The brothers unwitting answer is: they become comic book heroes. Their earlier effort, Bound, a lesbian detective story, has not been seen by this reviewer, but given the bold creative imagination, techno-wizardry and shallowness on display in their The Matrix, the Wachowskis have the look of the future. *Note: The reviewer categorizes serious motion pictures asfilms; less seriousmovies; and pure pandering no-brain entertainmentflicks. Notes (1)P.D. Ouspensky, In Search of the Miraculous, p. 219. (2)William Patrick Patterson, Struggle of the Magicians, p. 77.
|
For the remainder of this article, please order The Gurdjieff Journal Issue #20 |